A Summary of my important views…
Below are answers to my PAX questionnaire that summarize some of views on key issues that face our community. In addition to my specific positions, my key asset is my willingness to listen and consider different points of view on how best to enhance the quality of life here in Brookline. Please feel free to e-mail me: 17bcohen@gmail.com to discuss any of my positions or any other issues that affect our community.
Sincerely,
Bruce B. Cohen
And remember to VOTE on May 4!
1. Why am I running for this office? I am running for this position because I believe in community service and I want to continue to promote the high quality of life in Brookline. I am a firm believer in public service—I have worked in Federal and state government for over 25 years, and I have been active in civic affairs my entire adult life. Currently, I am President of Friends of Public Health, chair of the Brookline Public Health Advisory Committee, serve as co-chair of the Western Suburban Community Health Network, and participate actively on the Health Committee of Brookline’s Sister City Project. I have also been on TMMA executive board, the Brookline Neighborhood Alliance, past co-chair of the Washington Square Coalition, and Vice-President of Brookline Youth Baseball.
2. BUDGET: Rank 1-9 your priorities (“1” highest) regarding likely Town deficits, and briefly explain.
1 Public safety (police/fire)
2 Public health, human services
3 Schools
4 Facilities & streets
5 Parks & conservation
6 Affordable housing
7 Libraries
8 Recreation programs
9 Keep taxes level or lower
These are my priorities for maintaining services and town functions rather than an assessment of likely deficits. I feel maintaiing a strong core infrastructure is the key to quality of our civic life.
3. LABOR/PUBLIC EMPLOYEES: What is your opinion about, and past involvement (if any) with organized labor? Assuming they might save some money, at least in the short run, what is your opinion of (a) privatization, including replacement of unionized employees with outside contractors using non-union labor; and (b) hiring more part-time employees (without benefits or job security)?
I am totally against privatization of public services. As former Vice President of Local 41 of the American Federation of Government Employees, I firmly believe in both unionization for the protection and welfare of employees and the role of government in providing basic, infrastructure services. I believe the savings people claim for privatization in almost all cases are illusory. I come from an active union family and support the social goals of the progressive union movement. Hiring part-time employees without benefits in order to save money is unethical.
4. DEVELOPMENT & HOUSING
A. The abolition of rent control caused a loss of 7,000 affordable housing units in Brookline. What should the Town be doing to develop or preserve affordable housing in various parts of Brookline? What is your history of involvement (if any) in housing issues?
The goal of housing policy in Brookline should be to maintain and expand affordable housing stock in order to keep (and increase) the socioeconomic diversity in the community. In particular, I am concerned about maintaining affordable housing for the elderly, and lower income, single parent households. The Town should be more aggressive in requiring new construction to include affordable housing units and we should think about additional incentives, zoning changes, etc. that would stimulate the development of more affordable units in Brookline. I applaud the goals of the Fisher Hill development as a constructive effort to incorporate affordable housing into our community. I have not been active directly in affordable housing related issues…only indirectly to the extent that affordable housing is related public health and quality of life in our community.
B. What do you think about the trade-offs between encouraging development for more tax revenue and its impact on neighborhoods? Has the latter been given enough weight, e.g., by the Planning Board? Why or why not? What’s your experience (including TMM votes or in neighborhood groups) with these trade-offs, including – if you were a TMM – your vote on Art. 13 in the 2008 Fall Town Meeting (Coolidge Corner residential zoning amendment)?
I favor appropriate development that involves neighborhood concerns at the earliest possible time: this includes both residents and local businesses. However, I am concerned that neighborhoods must consider the quality of life in Brookline as a whole as well as what’s in the best interest of their immediate area. Sometimes, these trade-offs are not easy to see. I thought the goals of article 13 were laudable although the article itself I felt was somewhat flawed. I think more discussion with residents of properties affected would have benefited the contents of the Article. Ultimately, I supported it.
5. CANDIDATES: Who are a few electoral candidates (local or not) that you supported during the past two years, especially (a) with either an endorsement or a contribution, and (b) in selectman’s races?
I have supported and endorsed progressive candidates at the state, local, and national level–from canvassing for President Obama in New Hampshire to my involvement in Precinct 12’s Neighbors Building Brookline coalition.
6. SURVEILLANCE: What is your position on, and past activity (if any), regarding the surveillance cameras from the Department of Homeland Security, including (a) whether and how much the privacy intrusion bothers you, and (b) thoughts on the trade-offs between privacy loss and public safety goals?
I have not been active in this discussion other than writing a letter to the Board of Selectmen strongly encouraging them not to deploy these cameras and speaking out about this issue among my friends and town meeting colleagues. I feel the loss of privacy is not worth the gains in public safety. The ruse about their deployment for use to assist evacuation was particularly offensive to me.
7. DEATH PENALTY: What is your position on, and past involvement (if any) with, the death penalty?
This is a particularly difficult personal choice for me. Under certain, very limited circumstances of heinous, brutal, capital crimes I could support the death penalty. If a person walked into a kindergarten class and randomly opened fire and murdered children, and I was the parent of one of the victims, I would want the murderer executed. So, I can conceive of situations where I believe that I would support the death penalty, However, the current standards for the death penalty and bias in the implementation makes government sanction execution untenable at this time. I would be happy to discuss my personal views further with anyone interested.
8. RECORDED VOTES: Will you try to support at least one recorded vote on each night of Town Meeting? Why or why not?
I am a member of the Recorded Vote Coalition. I think that we should develop the technology to record ALL votes. I will stand for every suggested recorded or roll call vote. I believe that as representatives of our community, we have the obligation to make our positions on issues transparent and publicly available.
9. IMMINENT TMM ISSUES: Reserving your right to hear the debates, what are your views on:
A. Why should the Selectmen be given the official titles of Police and Fire Commissioners – or why not? (See warrant at http://www.brooklinema.gov/ and explanation at http://www.brooklinepax.org.)
I believe that the Selectmen should be given these titles. The reason I’m in town meeting is that I support this form of government rather than Mayoral-City Council model for Brookline. Thus, we need to invest full authority in our elected executive branch—the Selectmen. I don’t believe a Town Manager, no matter how competent, should make executive decisions.
B. Why (or why not) should more power to hire and fire department heads – e.g. Police, DPW, Planning – be given to the Town Administrator, and less to the selectmen, as proposed by a majority of CTO&S? (See summary at http://www.wickedlocal.com/brookline/archive/x1658508653/Article-would-give-more-power-to-Brooklines-town-administrator or at http://www.brooklinepax.org.)
Please see above 9A answer. I disagree with the CTO&S position about ultimate decision making on hiring. I do endorse the extremely active involvement of the town administrator and department heads in advising Selectmen in these hires.
10. Are NATIONAL AND INTERNATIONAL ISSUES (usually the subject of non-binding “resolutions”) sometimes proper for debate and votes in Town Meeting? Explain.
I prefer that the Town Meeting discussions and debate focus on issues which we can most readily affect and change, that is: local budget issues; the expenditure of tax dollars; the allocation of funds; setting priorities for the delivery of local services; the Town Capital Improvement Plan; infrastructure development including schools, libraries, parks, and recreational opportunities; land use planning; consideration of the Town Bylaws; and other local issues that emerge. However, I recognize the importance of communities taking a stand against policies that it considers as injustice; and thus, to a limited extent, support TM’s consideration of such issues.